June 16, 2012 Subject:
What the Bible's Revelation of Jesus Christ really reveals
You have to know the Bible and history to know what is really going on with the religious and political right:Jesus had sent out his disciples without swords to spread his Gospel,but the Roman Empire under Constantine sent out his men with swords to spread Jesus' Gospel in the Crusades,Holy Wars.And the Bible warns there will be a revival of this warrior Roman Empire headed by the antichrist,the beast 666,Satan's man,who will put himself in God's place and make the final and worst War,a Holy War,which the Bible says Jesus will return to stop or no flesh will be saved.And so God ends all Wars,beating swords to plows,farm equipment,and man learns War no more(Isaiah2:4).God doesn't end what is Holy,so Wars are not Holy,and so not of a Holy God,the God of the Holy Bible-despite what you've beed told and been led to believe.
February 7, 2010 Subject:
Secret Evil of 911
AlexJonesLemming wrote :"Watch out for Whacko stuff like blaming "the Jews"
This was in March 2005.
Since then, much research and investigations have taken place. Yet anyone and everyone is scared to speak out, lest they are tarred "antiSemite" - convenient sledge hammer to silence anyone who dares to speak.
February 22, 2008 Subject:
An eye opener
This video has a rocking beat and excellent composition, though not high production values.
It presents the issues it wants to raise in a provocative manner, and through the lyrics of the music, emotively. If ever there was a 9/11 "music video", this is it.
The video does not raise ALL the questions relevant to 9/11, but it does raise important one's. As such it is a good introduction into the conspiracy theories people have put forward about the events of that day.
September 23, 2007 Subject:
My Own Observations
I feel I am educated enough to think for myself, draw my own conclusions and (with a respect of the rights of the First Amendment) voice my views freely without fear.
Viewing this media medley reminds me that one should question things. Though, with me separating the ‘belief & opinions’ from hard facts is sometimes hard. So, I will not debate the Politic side of the events up to, or sense then.
Chapter One: The Weakest Link
Due to my family’s construction ties, I know some about buildings and demolitions.
Also, due to my Father in-law & the volunteer fire department that sponsored my Boy Scout troop, I know some about firefighting practices.
Obviously, WTC 7 was taken out via a controlled collapse. In a city like New York, the fire department has crews trained to contain a fire via a controlled demolition such as to contain such a blaze in lewd of the lack of crew (remember, the FDNY lost many good firefighters that day). Such is within the means of fire control, and the collapse would be considered fault of the fire. Though, apparent ignorance on the time and amount of explosives needed to do an improvised job like that.
Chapter Two: Melting Towers
With my hobby of blacksmithing/metalworking, I know some about steel.
I will not dispute the proposed temperatures of steel melting at 1535 C, the max of non-pressurized hydrocarbons is 825 C, with a difference of over 700 C.
Even though the fire could not melt the beams, it could weaken them severely. The internal steel super-structure of the Twin Towers was different from the other steel structured buildings quoted, so fire damage assessment by comparison is not applicable.
Due to the design within the Twin Towers, the floors were ‘hung’ between the center steel structure and the outer one. With the fire weakening the floor beams (as in the case of a Californian highway collapse due to a petroleum tanker fire), it would cause one floor to collapse onto the one below. Said floor would not be able to support the weight of itself and the one from above on it, so it would collapse to the floor beneath it and repeat quickly. The build up of air pressure, with each floors collapse, would blow out any windows and eject the loose items outwards, as seen on WTC 1.
On what would cause a building (WTC 2) to budge out like that? Weakened/collapsing structure, and the top of partly teetered over as was the belief should have been with WTC 7, though it did not slide off, it did start a floor collapse like that of WTC 1.
Eye witness accounts though valuable, are not 100% infallible. Opinions based on only video evidence can also be faulty. So, I will stick with the material evidence and not with the ‘shaky beliefs.” This structure collapse of the Twin Towers was in the PBS special “America Rebuilds”.
Chapter Three: Why?
The political, and big business fall-out, speculations of the events, I will not get into on why, though the Iraq issue (I refuse to call it a war, for there has been no declaration of said passed by any of the allied nations).
I will not argue that in the past, the Hessian régime did have chemical/biological weapons and used them. Did they have the potential to make more? Maybe. Did they have an active nuclear program? No. Was there a solid, and defined, link between Baghdad and al Qaeda? No.
What tomorrow? Here’s a preview...
“Will some of you civil liberties slip while we guarantee the security of this country? Maybe... Maybe,” says the Washington PR guy.
So, I agree with Ben Franklin, “He that gives up freedom for security deserves neither freedom nor security.”
The rest is conspiracy bits, which I will not comment on.
July 30, 2007 Subject:
Typical conspiracist nonsense. Claiming to be one of the elite few who are "enlightened" about things that had millions of witnesses.
The first minute of the video has some good 9-11 footage which is found in other places. The rest I wouldn't waste my time with.
To the reviewer who posted before me,
"Don't be stupid and say retarded things, just listen and if you dont like it then move along, don't fill reviews with Ignorence and Stupid remarks!!!"
Please follow your own advice.
July 8, 2007 Subject:
Ok, for all of you that are smarter then the people saying that this video is a waste of time, I hope you'll be ready when the time is near! People live their lives going to work and trying to be a great American, but yet they can not seem to open their eyes and see the truth is right infront of them. Why do people try and make others not be fooled is something I always ask myself, dig for it and you'll find what your looking for. Don't be stupid and say retarded things, just listen and if you dont like it then move along, don't fill reviews with Ignorence and Stupid remarks!!!
June 19, 2007 Subject:
are you serious?
this "vidoe evidence" is like a little kid asking a million stupid questions. offering no real science or facts. yes, something that weighs that much can fall straight down. its called physics. then they compare huge buildings to metal frame shacks? and 2 small fires? an F'ing airplane flew into it. and why dont they show the up-close footage of the first tower collapsing inward? they had to have seen it they got all that other jazz. more importantly, it just doesnt make sense. why not just have all the news channels tell us fake news reports about Iraq? dont tell me bush couldnt do that if he could set this shit up. or our government just do whatever they want and not tell us anything. look at the media in north korea, they dont get told anything about the outside world. if it doesnt make sense, its not true. too many people want to be individuals and have their voice heard instead of using that time to study reality and make themselves smart enough to figure out the "mystery of how buildings should fall when hit by commercial airliners".
May 22, 2007 Subject:
People believe this?
Do people watch movies like this and think, "Wow, they're right. Everything mentioned makes perfect sense." To those people I suggest looking up some of the sources that refute these ridiculous conspiracy theories with, you know, facts. I know that may not be as convincing as the rhetorical questions and vague comparisons used in this video, but give truth a chance.
Yeah GW is personally trying to murder people... get a life. The guy is limited to 2 terms of office and we are half way through the 2nd one. Let's waste some tax money and valuable time trying to impeach him and cheney before they leave... brilliant idea. I think the real conspiracy was all the bush bashers actually voted for him so they had something to bitch about. To think that that dimwit illegally rigged two presidential elections in a row under the eyes of 24/7 hostile media coverage is hilarious. Blaming roosevelt for pearl harbor and lincoln for the civil war are equally hilarious. Please understand:
1. We really did land on the moon.
2. The holocaust was real.
3. JFK was shot in the head by a marine rifleman. They are pretty good with a gun.
4. Bush was elected, twice.
5. 2 planes hit the WTC... I was watching live when the 2nd one hit. Really, on TV. I swear. Ask anyone.
May 8, 2007 Subject:
Whats so funny????
To to last reviwer what is do funny? Is it funny that our brothers, sisters, mothers and fathers, aunts uncles and friends are being MURDERED beacuse of what BUSH wants to gain POLITICALLY and MENTALLY. It is ashamed that we THE AMERICAN PEOPLE have to endure people like you and BUSH. My aunt needs to come home and be with us. I get the BIG PICTURE of what the film is trying to say. I want my freedom, liberty, life and health and BUSH need to get over it and realize that the war needs not to be a war. Get us out of there and back to where we were. It took Clinton almost 5 years( I do believe it was this #) to get us out of the red and it took BUSH 2 years to put us back! Now you do the math!
April 5, 2007 Subject:
LOL... LOL... LOL... LOL !!
September 28, 2006 Subject:
Lose the annoying sound track
The polemical tools needed to wake people up cannot mimick mass infotainment. People I need to persuade won't take Alex Jones hyperbole and heavy metal (no pun intended) seriously. Emotionalism has 40% of the country in a mind controlled trance.
Reviewer:cc mountain lion
September 16, 2006 Subject:
a pretext for war
"...in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility;
because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in
the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or
voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they
more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they
themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed
to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads
to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others
could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though
the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their
minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that
there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always
leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which
is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire
together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use
falsehood for the basest purposes." - Adolf Hitler MEIN KAMPF
August 3, 2006 Subject:
TheTruth Behind 9/11: The Evil behind The Bush Administration and the CIA
Well, mostly my point of view is the same as this movie's. The CIA and President Bush have and are pulling strings in the violence in Middle East and The War In Iraq. The 9/11 attacks were mostly pulled off by the CIA. But the World Trade Centre could not have collapsed even if it was hit by a plane superloaded with explosives. There were bombs hidden under the towers. For proof I reccommend you watch the movie Hidden Fuse or one that will be published on the Archive later on this month Imperial Amerika 3:The Bush Crackman Gone: The Twin Towers and the Collapse of Human Liberties in America. It shows proof that there was many buildings that were blazing many hours longer than the World Trade Twin Towers and did not collapse. The Bush administration will soon be relinquished. They call Al Qaeda terrorists, but the CIA and Bush are the terrorists. As some people may know that Al Qaeda is supporting Hezbollah and has already aided them with suicide bombers. If the Bush administration has more troops and resources than Israel, how is Israel going to cope with two threats Hezbollah and Al Qaeda that are fighting now.
A Luta Continua!
Reviewer:New World Chaos
August 1, 2006 Subject:
Transpiracy research vs. Conspiracy Theory
"Conspiracy theory" is the freshman course in Questioning Authority. Its goal is to teach the student to open his or her mind to things programmed all through life to be thought of as crazy to think possible. All schools of theory are investigated. Course syllabus includes material by David Icke and Texe Marrs. Students will analyse pop culture entertainment themed around secret elites and conspiracies and will write a position paper on the subject of whether this trend has been eye-opening or mind-closing.
Then, you graduate, and either go home to finish watching your X-files videos or take the graduate course, Transpiracy Research. This is applied conspiracy theory, lab work in reality, not just reading about the theories of others, but coming up with your own based on evidence you discover. Learn to tell the fact from the fiction, and the technologic meshing of these things in this century makes this very challenging. Find out what apophenia is and how to recognize false patterns that can be made to look real with cunning emphasis. Syllabus: Readings by David Ray Griffin, Paul Thompson, Michael Ruppert, Sander Hicks and others. Final exam: a detailed analysis of your take on 9/11 culpability. Must be credibly footnoted, documented and will be graded both on analysis of extant data and intelligent, novel speculation.
This course requires serious work and is not for people who have learned enough to question authority but sadly never become able to question their own perceptions.
This term - transpiracy research - needed to exist because transpiracy is WHAT TRANSPIRED and people who study it are constantly called conspiracy theorists, when theory is not the focus here. The focus is getting to the bottom of the insane lack of sense the official version makes! And the shill above defending it is speaking gibberish. He knows nothing about the towers.
A good transpiracy researcher will recognize and acknowledge errors made in their work, correct them and go on with the work. Some of them have exceedingly large egos and spend time having silly fights over who is the real thing and who's either a) tinfoil hatter or b) agent provocateur. Fortunately, calling them on their behaviour and telling them it doesn't befit a hero to act that way - and these folks are the closest thing to journalists America has any more, and that means heroes to me.
Bush dialed 9/11 to save his fraudulent presidency - which he actually never really wanted before Karl Rove manipulated him and his family into the deal around '99. He is obviously either clinically insane or sickeningly evil, or both - none of these are comforting thoughts.
People have began to wake up and realise the largest military in the world could not just sit there twiddling thumbs...with the President reading My Pet Goat, while FOUR giant airliners go missing, with zero response. This alone nails them pretty firmly, but it's the tip of an enormous pile of FACTS, most sourced straight from the government itself. This was a Reichstag fire, a morale tweaker, a griefsploitation circus making millions for a corrupt cabal of media megacorps. The sick thing is they get rich from both ends, making gravy from the opposition to this cruel regime.
THIS is why the "Detention and Removal Centers" are not operational yet; they NEED the dissidents to buy what they sell, and help prove to the world we aren't fascists, YET. Once they've looted the whole treasury and destroyed the economy, they won't have any use for us any more, but one. SLAVERY.
If you think "but that cannot happen in America, the law protects us!" realise you are living in the 20th century, as we likely most all wish we were. This protection has been quietly stripped away, and is still being stripped away, slowly, using riders to unrelated bills in legislature at STATE levels, not Federal - laws which tie into the Gordian knot that is the treasonous "Patriot Act" are the danger here, for no one pays much attention since the name of the bill will have nothing to do with the law getting passed and state congresses don't draw much press. (True Progressives, take note, and get on it.)
No one wants to believe their precious free country has been taken by coup and their freedoms eroded right before their eyes and realise they had not even noticed it. This is a doubly difficult thing for a mind to accept. This causes a lot of people to shut down and just assume the fairy tale is the reality because it would mean they would not have to worry about the future as much.
Oh, something most folks don't know: The New York Times ran a story citing the official vote count showed Gore won 2000. The date of the story was 10 September 2001. Likely a coincidence. Possibly not. If anything, the STORY was run to coincide with the attack, not vice versa. No one noticed or if they did, forgot quickly after the next morning.
Another thing. I've been reading about 9/11 since the day it hit me, THERE WAS NEVER A MENTION ANYWHERE of an AL-QAEDA before fall of 2001. An Air Force Training manual, "The Middle East in Transition" dated 2000, has an entire chapter dedicated to terrorism. The name Al Quaeda/Al Qaida appears not once. Care to bet on how often it shows up in the "new American century" version of that book? Seriously, if you know anyone from USAF, check this out and THINK.
Osama bin Laden is given half a sentence: he's simply reported to be the son of a wealthy Saudi family who "works alone or with one or two others" in committing terrorist acts.
I distinctly remember being told by Rumsfeld that these guys have been working and training for YEARS. Discrepancy? Just throw it over there with all 6000 other ones.
Al Qaeda? More like ALL CIA. DUH!
ps: For a longer more transpiracy-research oriented documentary on this subject, I encourage you all to view the film Loose Change. It is stellar, well made and hits most of the major points. The auteur has released it to the public--go to http://letsroll911.org for links to it.
And take off the tinfoil hat image for good! The day we are able to be conned into believing these people by that kind of nonsense is over. What we do next will determine the future of the United States of America. If we don't, the rest of the world might decide to. ALWAYS remember that.
August 1, 2006 Subject:
Ok if this is true...than what made them think they could get away with it. How bout Oklahoma City? Anyway, the force of compression can cause the little bursts out the side of the building. And, Most people will call a breaking ceiling joist an "expolsion". Anyway, this documentary needs some more experts, documented experts, like ones with degress and stuff, to be interviewed to be believed. Just some more propoganda. Either way the World is in an uproar and all we wanna do is blame. What are we, or can we do about it? And, if we cant do anything about it are you ready or not to suffer for not trying? Well anyway, this video does make you think. I had a pacistan guy tell me the same thing just 2 days ago when I was in his store for infidel's, convience store that sells smut, every kind of cigerette and cigar, junk food, and lottery tickets. However, we live in America and he has the right to do that. I wonder if Mohammed said it was ok? Enuf ranting. Prepare yourselves brothers and sisters for more to come and I hope you are right with your maker. You could be takein out anytime for no particular reason. "Fear is the great motivator" (Art Bell, A-Whole-Lot-of-Others).
July 15, 2006 Subject:
the fear of being paranoid .. in itself is paranoid .. and most of the "paranoid" ideas made good sense ... do you not think that whoever whould have planted the charges had enough sense to make it leave no evidence other than the act itself ... hitler burning the reichstag .... roosevelt knowing of pearl harbor .. and not doing anything ... even putting them on break to make the attack worse ... as the video said .. create an enemy .. what happened to our isolationist ideals ... we cant invade a country every time a baby is slapped on the ass .. we wont survive it ..
April 3, 2006 Subject:
Red or blue pill? Wonderland sucks, i'll take the red one.
This film, whilst poorly edited and containing grammatical errors, still packs a punch. Good enough to feature on one of the 9/11 truth movements most vocal, credible frontmen's website "as a good intro", I give it 5 stars.
I also curse its author, we want your name, for its release. I expected a joke film, similar to the illuminati referenced music re-mix of a Bush speech. What I got was 10 months research to debunk it and the best acid trip of truth anyone ever needs.
Paranoid and tin-foiled hatted. Im afraid not. The tin-foil hats are firmly on the heads of the followers of the official 9/11 story. Currently being campaigned to be correctly re-classifed as a work of fiction, 'The 9/11 Ommission Distort' is nothing but a fable, as believable as the tooth fairy, its followers should be ashamed, regardless of political belief. 9/11, whilst another historical example of corrupt gevernments furthering thier agendas and creating a gradual slip to dictatorship, transcends politics, its about the children folks. Yours! It's about the legacy we will leave and the lessons we are supposed to have learnt to avoid repeating. The powers that be, have not changed and corruption runs through their veins, ever more empowered by crimes commited and justices slipped. A game of chess is afoot of monstrous proportions, a little research confirms it. Idiots calling for security measures that will enslave, fools offering solutions to disaster forensics and more convenient shopping systems, that will destory jobs and privacy. Cretins ask for gun control, over the overthrow of complicit fear driven media that drives the random killings. When will you realise that the powers are going to knock your door real soon, like the katrina exercise, and take your defences. Then like the UK, a million DeMenezes will be wronged and legislation crept upon you since WACO, will waive the powers actions of ineptitude and complicity.
Already the proven innocent, rot in thier orange suits, made in China, enough for us all. Whilst FEMA money builds fat Haliburton linked camps, to house the dissenters. For christs sake did no-one have thier eyes open through George Lucas's and Reagans Star Wars!!
Anakin Skywalker, the peoples power, led astray by a fake leader (Palpatine Bush Sidious), busy building his dictatorship through false terrors and thier minions (Dooku Bin Laden and Al-CIAda). The force is strong but, if you allow it, the first 3 films will enslave you, dissenting rebel alliances against the jackboot of the 4th Reich's double speaking patriot act, an orwellian totalitarian dictatorship. The war of Oceania's ages is now, the perpetrators, the funders of Hitler. The false-flag's appearance is the only difference, the backers are the same.
The Arab League rappers are right- "A thousand points of light, a new world order". It's just not new and not clever. Simply that we have been dumbed down to accept it wholeheartedly, unrealisingly.
"Wake up infidel, Destroy the Death Star"
"Wake up infidel, they've taken it too far"
"Wake up infidel, you're paying for this war"
"Wake up infidel, Blow up the Death Star"
If you can only character attack my comments rather than the evidence in the films, you are clearly foolish or complicit. I urge everyone to show this film to everyone they know, so that soon justice may be served to the corrupt.
A good film in otherwords. 9/11 revisted :were explosives used being another. The finer points of the conspiracy may require more research but the evidence of conrolled demolition is very strong indeed.
February 17, 2006 Subject:
norm angeleri and alex jones
this sounds like the same kind of thing that these two so called experts talk about.
February 5, 2006 Subject:
I found the video interesting and it may even be right.
If it was terrorists it has subsequently done them no good at all except to give the US of A a good excuse to go & kick ass in the Middle East & to subjugate the American population even further than they already were.
I feel that it is an incredible coincidence that 9-11 took place when it did, the oil companies have had a slap on the wrist for over exaggerating their reserves which means there is less oil than they admitted & the USA is out of favour with many other oil producing countries. Iran is trying to build a nuclear bomb it seems, so it can protect itself from the USA stealing it's oil...Need I go on.
So 9-11 happens & it's open day on muslim countries and the Middle East, either way America is the winner. So it doesn't & never did matter who blew up the WTT except to those left injured or the grieving relatives of the dead.
Whatever happened on that fateful day it was entirely of America's making!
I am not a Muslim neither am I anti-American, I think the subsequent actions of the USA & the UK speak for themselves. As Colin Powell said "it's like a dream come true" or words to that effect.
February 4, 2006 Subject:
G.H.W. Bush: "New World Order"
The silly propagandists who slapped together this thing -- along with various other paranoids out there in Moonbat Land -- are fond of the false notion that Bush-41 introduced his vision of a "New World Order" in an address to Congress on September 11, 1990. Mysterious voices inside their tin hats tell them that it must be more than a coincidence that the 9/11 attacks occurred exactly eleven years to the day after this "introduction." Surely, they proclaim, there must be something sinister going on there!
But alas, the facts inconveniently trip them up.
George Herbert Walker Bush did not introduce his vision of a "New World Order" during his address to a joint session of Congress on 9-11-90. His first public mention concerning a "New World Order" was made a number of days prior to that speech.
Here is an except from President George H.W. Bush's press conference on August 30, 1990...
QUESTION: Mr. President, there are reports that there's a split in your administration -- some who want to expand the goals to include the eventual ouster of Saddam. And also, there are many, many suggestions for a Middle East conference that would include in what you would call the post-postwar shape of the world, the perennial problems of the Middle East. What do you think on both -- --
PRESIDENT'S RESPONSE: Well, I think on the second part of the question that we ought to get on with the business at hand, the shorter run business, which is the solution to this question: the making right the situation in Kuwait, meaning the pulling out of forces, obviously, and the restoration of the rulers. As I look at the countries that are chipping in here now, I think we do have a chance at a NEW WORLD ORDER, and I'd like to think that out of this dreary performance by Saddam Hussein there could be now an opportunity for peace all through the Middle East. But we have to be sure that what's been undertaken so far is successful before we can move to that other agenda, it seems to me.
Hugh Sidey of Time magazine took note of Bush's "New World Order" phrasing of August 30th and made mention of it in his weekly magazine column in Time's September 10, 1990 issue...
Sep. 10, 1990
Sometimes George Bush is at his dining room table in Kennebunkport, Me., looking beyond the rocky shore to the open water, and sometimes he is on his boat, casting for bluefish, when he wonders aloud about the NEW WORLD ORDER he must shape once the Iraqi confrontation plays out. He is looking beyond pure military matters. Bush is mildly disappointed with the response from Europe, Britain and France excepted. He is pleased as punch that Mikhail Gorbachev stepped up to be counted with the U.S. Japan came through pretty well; more is expected. The President knows he must recast relations with Israel, design.
December 11, 2005 Subject:
This is mandatory viewing
Whether one believes this is true or not, the fact remains that the men and women that survived (and thusly died) in this attack experienced explosions and that fact was NOT addressed by the Bush Admin. The FACT that Bush did NOT want to investigate until the Victims Families forced him to do so is also fishy. The FACT that 9/11, so called carried out by Saudis later turned into so-called Iraq support, then Iraq WMDs, then Iraqi Freedom. Now we are fighting in a war so far removed from how this started and the Bush Admin is not answering any of the original questions. Those are FACTS. This video addresses the questions we all want answers to, or else we will lose more lives, integrity, and money to a cause that we never understood or will bring peace or peace of mind to us or our children.
October 20, 2005 Subject:
An Excellent Film
The only adverse remark to be made about this film is its occasional misspellings. Of course, if one is a Republican, one can also contribute contentless abuse.
October 10, 2005 Subject:
Sort of a mini Farenheit 9/11 with a more conspiratorial bent
Certainly worth a watch for an intro to alternative theories of what happened on 9/11. Asked more questions than it answered, but left me interested in pursuing this issue further (which I'll do soon enough...)
September 18, 2005 Subject:
grabs the essential of 9-11
not such a good quality but it raises the essential questions on 9-11 .. moreover (and thats the nature of such films) it tries to brainwash you to blaim bush-administration
because of the essential parts: 4 stars
September 17, 2005 Subject:
Excellent Oliver Stone is proud of you
Quick your tin-foil hat just flew away, Karl Rove's mind control rays may get in! RUN!!!
May 29, 2005 Subject:
Fairly well explained
I think this is fairly well explained--the explosives had to be placed, not on the outer edges, but around the interior steel core, as the all the floors were supported by the core. (i.e. an entire floor could be removed, and the floors above would not collapse.
But it certainly doesn't bode well for the future of demolition companies, does it--if all an owner has to do is dowse their "white elephant" skyscrapers with kerosine--?
Especially with all the concrete exploded in mid-air, (did you notice?) into dust particles the size of talcum powder, it was carried far away from the site, so that the clean up only consisted of Steel beams neatly 22-feet long, the right size to fit the truck beds. and
Yes, indeedy, kerosine is the way to go for all demolitions of the future.
May 25, 2005 Subject:
"terrorists did it"
The question comes up, how do you know that Arab terrorists did not take down the towers with
1. the official story said that did not happen. It would be obvious to the official forensic team. Why would they lie if they were not in on it?
3. The rubble from the crime scene was not preserved for analyis the way it would be for a disaster. It was quickly scooped up and shipped to China where it was melted. Officials did not want third parties studying the wreckage.
May 20, 2005 Subject:
Watch his next film where he concludes Barney the Dinosaur is a Drug Lord and a pedophile.
Alright I confess, I was on the grassy knoll.
I was kidnapped by aliens.
And a secret lost Amazon tribe of women held me captive and used me for sexual purposes for 5 years.
Did I mention I am the tooth fairy?
Dreck, that is the best word to describe this film, paranoid dreck.
May 19, 2005 Subject:
Was an OK film.
This is the kind of film you need to not take every-bit of it seriously. It does raise some interesting questions however.
May 17, 2005 Subject:
Simple physics describe exactly why the buildings collapsed the way they did. The person who put this together should have spent 1 minute studying architecture for every hour they spent producing this collage of ridiculousness.
1) Each floor is designed to hold the weight of the floors above it, plus a safety margin. Once that margin is exceeded the inertia of the floors above coming down is simply unstoppable.
2) The steel didn't need to melt. It only neede to be weakened a few percent across a span before buckling. Imagine lowering a few center cards of a card castle 1/4 inch. The tolerances in a skyscraper are much more critical.
3) Don't fool yourself that the planes' impacts caused no damage whatsoever to the structure. This is a red snapper compared to the heat, but may well have contributed to the first supports buckling.
4) The heat was highest near the center. The edges are cooled by the air, so the center gave out first, causing the momentum to be generally inward to start with.
5) As each floor collapsed the air burst outward just like it does when you drop a phonebook onto the floor, producing a bang as the velocity increased.
6) When the rate of descent times the width of the building exceeded the speed of sound the building produced consecutive sonic booms for each floor demolished as it fell, and as the displacement of air cushioned each collapsing floor it limited the rate of descent of the building to a proportion of the speed of sound.
7) At no time after the falling of the initial few floors did anything cause a sideward impetus to be imparted to the falling building.
8) I'm sure Bin Laden would much rather have had the buildings fall sideways. What he didn't take into account was that the buildings were designed to recover lateral movement and resist vertical movement. The resistance broke with the momentum of the top 15-30 floors falling a meagre 30 feet.
Agreed with Rob, the terrorists no doubt had ground operatives. Who? Someone who could get inside and wire two tall buildings from top to bottom --- controlled demolition. They didn't "blow up", they blew down.
Agreed with UglyGeorge, ALL the News media should have their licenses pulled. By whom? Republicans? Democrats? Who does the media serve anyhow? Who pays them? Can you put this video on TV? What is it they sell, and to whom? They sell YOU to business, Mr. Consumer Unit. Advertisers target YOUR mindspace. They sell public compliance, too.
In a film called JFKii, I've seen Peter Jennings debunking conspiracy theories about JFK, using original TV footage from 1963 --- except the old newscast is doctored to hide the obvious.
ALL the NWO talk comes from Conservative Christians, NOT HIPPIES. BE CAREFUL. Some is whacko. This film seems straight, based on other collected info I've seen.
This film focuses more on Bush. It has to. 9-11 DID happen on Bush's watch, and Bush DID block most investigation. Researchers report Bi-Partisan collusion, US Intell specialists visiting Pakistanis who funded AL-Qaida, etc. Clinton blocked FBI from Saudi trail, Bush blocked FBI more strictly. Marvin Bush DID run security at the WTC. on and on...
Watch out for Whacko stuff like blaming "the Jews" instead of noting "some Jews represent arms dealers, not Judaism" -- some tries to force fit everything to Scripture and Revelation -- magic. Some points on "evil + occult" is straight fact.
I don't do "hocus-pocus" --- but clandestine footage of World Leaders in 1999 at an ancient Ritual featuring an Idol of Evil -- Bohemian Grove -- is pretty convincing. Does "we wipe our eyes with carrion" sound very Christian? How about roasting a infant effigy (Care, Conscience) in a giant funeral pyre?
Some speak of the Evil New World Order referring to known institutions like the CFR, Bilderburg, Tri-Lateral Comm, and PNAC. PNAC, TLC, and CFR can't be a conspiracy theory, if they have their own websites. There is NO democratic input to their world decisions.
PNAC openly speaks of massive mil dominance - air, sea, land, and space - and "throwing small countries against the wall". Tommy Franks speaks of Martial Law in Cigar Aficianado. Cheney says there WILL be another attack, and our Civil Liberties will be "temporarily" suspended.
"Secret Evil" is only a teaser. Infowars "Matrix of Evil" and "Martial Law" has 2+ hours of details, and Mike Ruppert's "Truth and Lies" has a 2 hour lecture using Govt's own documents and books.
March 5, 2005 Subject:
A Good Idea Goes Strangely Wrong
This film starts out interestingly enough, with the supposition that someone in on the 9/11 attacks actually placed explosives in the buildings to make them fall. Okay, but even if that theory were true, it's much more likely that the same terrorists who synchronized four airplanes had operatives on the ground, too. Unfortunately, the film goes down the traditional paranoid rat hole, blaming everything on Republicans and some secret society bent on enslaving the free world. Maybe some old hippes might believe it, but I sure don't.